Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paul Jubb vs Quentin Halys Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jubb vs Halys analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Paul Jubb vs Quentin Halys Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jubb 0 - 0 Halys
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jubb has won 52.42% of points on their second serve, while Halys has won 51.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jubb, in recent form, has won 53.24% of their opponent's second serve points, while Halys has won 49.12%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.74% and 29.21% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jubb has saved 64.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Halys has saved 62.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jubb has won 69.32% of matches played (W/L 61/ 27), with Halys winning 46.67% (W/L 21/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jubb has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 76% (W/L 51/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 18/ 15). Halys has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 19/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 103/ 93).
- Player level: In the last year, Jubb has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 30/ 12), where as Halys has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 11/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jubb has played against opponents with an average rank of 274.11 while Halys has played against players with an average rank of 219.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jubb has won 45% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Halys has won 47% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jubb has converted 39.87% of breakpoint opportunities, and Halys has converted 39.11% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
289
Rank
196
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
223
Rank
61
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
70% (208-90)
Career Total W/L
56% (378-301)
69% (38-17)
YTD W/L
53% (18-16)
$230,255
Career Prize Money
$1,339,220
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Paul Jubb vs Quentin Halys For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jubb VS Halys
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Jubb | Quentin Halys |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 69% (38/17) | 53% (18/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (85/45) | 52% (43/40) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (692/558) | 51% (411/397) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 74% (20/7) | 38% (3/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 47% (7/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 69% (9/4) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 69% (9/4) | 100% (3/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.4 | 0.84 |
| Aces Total | 246 | 330 |
| DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 177 | 117 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:43 | 1:41:32 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 254.22 | 255.15 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (2438/3905) | 56% (1394/2490) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (1768/2438) | 78% (1083/1394) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (769/1467) | 51% (560/1096) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (179/449) | 38% (79/207) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1743/4187) | 37% (941/2564) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (6/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 71% (5/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (26/13) | 55% (11/9) |
| Futures W/L | 78% (7/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 69% (37/54) | 52% (16/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 73% (11/15) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 52% (11/21) | 55% (6/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (37/32) | 83% (18/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (37/5) | 17% (18/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (18/6) | 19% (16/3) |
Paul Jubb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Sebastian Ofner
Player
Paul Jubb
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
15
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Ben Shelton
61%
(
71 of
116)
1st Serve %
71%
(
92 of
129)
1
Aces
13
5
Double Faults
6
76%
(
54 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
60 of
92)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
17%
(
3 of
18)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
43 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
52 of
129)
125
Total Points Won
120
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Adam Walton
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Maximilian Marterer
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
12 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
39 of
53)
8
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
1
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Joan Nadal
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
6
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Paul Jubb
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
46%
(
18 of
39)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
8
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Paul Jubb
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
9
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
48 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
28 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 6-7(14) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
47 of
82)
3
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
20 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
83
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Paul Jubb
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Quentin Halys Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Beibit Zhukayev
65%
(
54 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
22
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
4
91%
(
49 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
37 of
50)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
18 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
78)
94
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Jay Clarke
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
16
Aces
12
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
88%
(
36 of
41)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
22 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Gregoire Barrere
49%
(
23 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
14
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
79%
(
19 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Quentin Halys
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
8
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
14 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
12 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
44
Total Points Won
38
|
7-5 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Mathias Bourgue
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Tristan Lamasine
46%
(
36 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
57 of
102)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Quentin Halys
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
2
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
3
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Diego Sebastian Schwartzman
58%
(
69 of
120)
1st Serve %
71%
(
94 of
133)
13
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
56 of
69)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
58 of
94)
43%
(
22 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
42 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
52 of
133)
130
Total Points Won
123
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Alexis Galarneau
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jubb Vs Halys Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jubb are available here and Halys photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paul Jubb
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Quentin Halys
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
